Nick Plant Role: Pro-Vice-Chancellor: Research and InnovationDiscipline: Systems ToxicologyInstitution: University of Leeds Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story My career has involved transitioning from a research-focussed role to a leadership-focussed one. That shift required some deliberate decisions about what to stop doing and where I could have the greatest impact. If I could advise my younger self, I would say two things. First, be kinder to yourself. The decisions you make are the best you can make at the time. Looking back and ruminating over them does not change them. Second, be true to yourself. I spent too much time worrying about what others thought, rather than concentrating on what was right for me. One assumption I had to unlearn was that changing direction might be seen as a failure or a step away from “real” research. In fact, if you do what you do best, people will respect that. And if they do not, that is their problem, not yours. Over time, I have realised that I can make the most impact by supporting others to be their best selves. Research …
From Magic Circle solicitor to Professor: choosing intrinsic satisfaction, surviving career traps and learning that “good enough” really is good enough
Contributor role: Professor Discipline: Law Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story I began my career training and working as a Solicitor in a Magic Circle law firm in London. During my training, I took a secondment that helped me realise that what I most enjoyed was legal research. I could see that as I became more senior in practice, I would do less of the work I loved because I would simply become too expensive for clients to use for detailed research. My role would have been to check what others had done. I tested the waters by teaching for the Open University while still in practice. I realised I loved both teaching and the sense that I was making a positive, direct difference to students. So I took what felt like a bold step and applied for a funded PhD. Many colleagues were bewildered that I would leave a lucrative and promising legal career to become a student again. But I wanted a career that felt intrinsically satisfying. My PhD was hard going. In my third year, I became …
Redefining progression: building influence and expertise as a long-term researcher outside traditional academic hierarchies
Contributor role: Research Fellow Discipline: Environmental Science / Chemistry Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story I gained my PhD in 2007 and have been employed as a postdoctoral researcher since then. While still precariously funded, I am no longer an early career researcher. Instead, I see myself as a “long-term researcher” — someone whose role now includes some responsibilities and activities more akin to those of an academic or mid-career researcher, even if the title does not formally reflect that. This was not an intentional career path. For several years I worked part-time (0.4 FTE) in research while pursuing a separate career. For a complex set of reasons, I eventually returned to research as my sole career and am now navigating a university system that, in my view, benefits greatly from experienced researchers like me but does not provide many formal routes for recognition or progression. Over time, I have found being a more senior researcher – working across multiple projects and taking on informal leadership responsibilities – more enjoyable and rewarding than my early postdoctoral years. It suits my …
Redefining success on my own terms, pushing back against imposed limits, and leading with passion rather than permission
Anonymous contributor Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story As a T&S member of staff at my institution, I found myself in a position where it was decided how my career would advance. The decision was made without my opinion and what was decided undermined my qualifications and experiences. From my point of view, there was clear prejudice but leaving my institution was not the answer (at this point I had encountered prejudice everywhere!). So I took myself out of this biased and condescending vision of my future that had been constructed for me and created my own. In pushing back against others’ views of you, there is a lot you need to keep in mind. Honesty is not always the best way forward, especially when EDI issues are involved. Instead, spend time learning from every injustice and pivoting from the lessons you identified. Doing this, I realised I needed to be connected to myself in a way that allowed me to work alone if I needed to and to be very picky about who I worked with – people …
Becoming a Head of School and a father on the same day: rethinking research, leadership and asking for help.
Hugo Dobson Role: Professor and Faculty Director of One University Strategy Delivery (Arts and Humanities) Discipline: International Relations and East Asian StudiesInstitution: University of Sheffield Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story I was interviewed for and offered the position of Head of School on the same day I found out I was going to become a dad. Either of these events would have required me to rethink my approach to research. Both at once made this rethink an absolute necessity. Looking back, I would tell myself: ask others for help, at work and at home, and do not suffer in silence. I assumed at one point that leadership roles are lonely. They can feel that way, but they do not have to be. One of the practical changes I made was to stop trying to do everything alone in my research. I actively decided to seek out co-authors and invest more in collaborative projects rather than working in isolation. I also became much more intentional about quality. Instead of trying to produce as much as possible, I focused on producing fewer, higher-quality outputs. …
From over-extension to intentional focus: redefining progression while balancing leadership, maternity leave, and long-term impact.
Jiao Ji Role: Lecturer in FinanceDiscipline: Accounting and FinanceInstitution: University of Sheffield Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story Over the past several years, I have balanced a full academic workload with two periods of maternity leave, returning each time to a demanding teaching and leadership environment while maintaining an active research agenda. Alongside my role as Programme Director, I have taken on significant EDI and pastoral responsibilities, particularly supporting early-career colleagues and academic parents, while working toward long-term progression to Senior Lecturer and Professor. Earlier in my career, I equated visibility with progress. I said yes frequently, took on service roles, and absorbed expectations without always questioning whether they aligned with my longer-term goals. Over time, and particularly after maternity leave, I realised that sustainability and focus mattered more than constant availability. If I could advise my younger self, I would tell myself to be more selective earlier – about projects, service, and expectations – and to trust that focus matters more than visibility. I would advise myself not to internalise structural barriers as personal shortcomings, and to align effort with long-term goals rather than short-term reassurance. Most importantly, I would remind myself that sustainability is not a …
From always volunteering to choosing deliberately: learning that saying no can protect both progression and wellbeing.
Candice Majewski Role: Senior Lecturer Discipline: Engineering Institution: University of Sheffield Please note: This story reflects the personal experience and perspective of its contributor. Academic careers vary widely, and others may experience different challenges and opportunities. Career Story For many years, I have been someone who always volunteers for things and always tries to help out when needed. Being that person has generally made me feel content in my academic role. I value being a good team player and contributing to the Department in a variety of ways. However, it has also meant that I have not progressed as well as I could or perhaps should have in other areas, particularly research, which is a key and absolute requirement for career progression. Looking back, I would tell myself this: it is important to be a good team player, but that does not mean it always has to be you doing all the things. One myth I have had to unlearn is that saying no will make people think I am no longer a helpful or good member of the team. That has not been true. In reality, most people understand, and in many cases respect, clearer boundaries. For those who don’t, I’m not necessarily the one in the wrong… Over time, I have become more selective about what I say yes to …
Be strategic with your time investment – set triaging criteria
This video from the Academic’s Success Guide, explains how using ‘triaging’ can help you to filter out the most meaningful opportunities, prioritise your work and be clear about what you say yes or no to in both the long and short term. It also helps you to find constructive language when saying yes and no to colleagues (or yourself!). “Initially I wanted to agree to all research projects. But I have diverse interests and my group started to feel incoherent and fragmented. Through a training session I was encouraged to give my lab a “vision” and “mission”. I also explicitly classified the projects into subgroups. I try not to take on any work that cannot fit into the vision/mission or groups. This has helped bring all lab members toward a common goal and helped define what I do to external parties.” Benjamin Lichman, Senior Research Fellow / Senior Lecturer, University of York. Read more from Benjamin. What will you take forward? One thing to try: What simple triaging criteria could you use to decide more confidently what to say yes to, no to, or not now, the next time an opportunity comes your way?
Be mindful of your capacity – use the Ferris wheel test
A simple metaphor for time and capacity management. As an established researcher, the challenge is rarely a lack of opportunity. It is managing too many meaningful, worthwhile requests within finite time and energy. Advice to “just say no” often feels unrealistic given the relational, reputational, and leadership dimensions of academic work. The Ferris wheel offers a practical way to think about capacity. Imagine yourself as the Ferris wheel operator. You are responsible for a ride with a fixed number of carriages. Each carriage has a clear capacity. Once they are full, adding more people isn’t generous or helpful. It’s unsafe, uncomfortable, and leads to a poor experience for everyone already on board. Overfilled Ferris wheels are often the result of saying yes to things you genuinely want to do: interesting projects, good collaborators, work that matters. This metaphor isn’t about disengagement. It’s about realism, including recognising that sometimes you have to say no even to opportunities you value. (This links closely to the idea of fishing sustainably from a river: you have to let some fish go). A good operator doesn’t overpromise when the wheel is full. They explain the risks of boarding and the wait time, allowing passengers to …
Strategies for saying no effectively to allow for more deep work
Cal Newport is an author and computer science professor who is known for his work on productivity, digital minimalism, and the impact of technology on society. His writing on ‘deep work’ resonates with academics because it uses and gives examples from academia and research and, in this podcast on The Art of Saying No, he shares several strategies for saying no effectively, including: The “art of no” discussion is in the Deep Dive section of the podcast between 07:06 and 23:45. All of Cal Newport’s resources are available on his The Deep Life website. What will you take forward? One thing to consider: What kind of deep work do you most want to protect, and what would it feel like to make significant progress with it?
A reflection on nine months of saying no
In this blog, Prof Sue Fletcher-Watson (Professor of Developmental Psychology) shares progress on a ‘year of radical nos’. Read about what ended up being politely declined, what made the greatest difference to her time and what she found it more difficult to say no to. What will you take forward? One thing to consider: Learn from a senior academic’s lived experiment in saying no, including what made the biggest difference.
Reframe unhelpful beliefs about saying no
When new opportunities arise that you genuinely don’t have time or capacity for, they often trigger a familiar stream of shoulds and oughts. For many established researchers, this is accompanied by a strong inner critic warning that saying no makes you unhelpful, uncollegiate, or even professionally risky. You may notice worries about letting others down, damaging relationships, or missing out on future opportunities. It can be helpful to pause and notice these beliefs rather than taking them at face value. Guilt and fear of missing out are powerful signals, but they are not always reliable guides. In some situations, saying no may actually create space for others to step up, redistribute work more fairly, or protect the quality of the commitments you have already made. Try writing down the beliefs you hold about being someone who says no. Then gently test them. Are they always true? What evidence supports them, and what evidence contradicts them? What might be another, equally valid way of looking at the situation? Think of a role model or excellent mentor that you know well. How might they reframe it? “I’ll feel guilty when someone else has to take this on.” → Saying no allows work …
Develop a new habit: use structures and scripts
Requests are rarely the problem. How we respond to them, often in the moment and under pressure, is. This resource offers practical structures and ready-to-use language to help you respond to requests with clarity and confidence, without relying on willpower in the heat of the moment or damaging important relationships. As an established researcher, you can probably predict the types of requests you encounter, even if you can’t predict when they will arise or who they will come from. When caught off guard, it’s easy to default to saying yes. Do you recognise the pattern of agreeing quickly, then later feeling regret, pressure, or guilt? Saying no can feel awkward, and many of us were never taught how to do it well. That’s no reason not to learn. It’s a skill like any other, and one that can be developed deliberately. One way to do this is to use structures and scripts as stabilisers while you’re learning, like support wheels on a bike or a trellis that helps a young plant grow upright until it can stand on its own. A short planning activity Write a list of activities or responsibilities that you’ve taken on in the past and then …
Let things go: you’re fishing from a river, not a pond
As an established researcher, it is important to accept that you will let some things go, including opportunities you would have enjoyed, gained recognition from, or that have served you well in the past. A helpful phrase to hold in mind is: “What got you here won’t get you there.” Many of the activities you do well, that others value, and that you may genuinely enjoy, will have helped you to become established in your career. Over time, however, these same activities can begin to crowd out space for the next phase of your development. Habits that were useful earlier on like saying yes and taking on admin roles can quietly become constraints. Think of your early career as fishing from a pond of opportunities. The pond was relatively contained, and with effort and enthusiasm it was possible to try a wide range of things and catch almost everything. Saying yes helped you build skills, raise your profile, test career directions, and gain credibility. Catching all the fish was hard work, but achievable. As an established researcher, that pond has become a flowing river (or raging torrent!). Opportunities are now abundant and continuously arriving. It is no longer possible, or …
Values based decision making and prioritising – can you identify and name your values?
A values-based approach to decision making can help you clarify what matters most to you. When you are clear on your values, it becomes easier and more purposeful to say yes, no, or not now. Decisions feel less reactive and more intentional. It can also increase motivation. When a task genuinely aligns with your values, you are more likely to engage with it fully and sustain your effort over time. The difficulty is that many of us struggle to articulate our values clearly. Day to day pressures can pull us away from them, and without that connection we may find ourselves committing to activities without a compelling reason for doing so. Think about the decisions you’ve had to make about your commitments over the past week: a request to join a committee or review a paper, an invitation to lead a work-package on a grant, to act as external examiner. What truly aligns with your values and the things you want to feel proud of in your career and life? Whilst some of these activities might be non-negotiable, others might be for another time or could be adapted slightly to ensure they allow you to really live your values. For …
Create a Gantt Chart – even if it’s imperfect and you only do it once!
Gantt charts are divisive in the planning world – love them or hate them, they can save time and aid influence and negotiation. While often criticised for being created then ignored, they hold value even as a one-off exercise. Why? Even an imperfect Gantt chart can clarify milestones, highlight potential workload bottlenecks, and prompt decisions. Use them to suggest ideal deadlines, demonstrate periods of high pressure, and justify changes in priorities, rescheduling, or resource requests. Visual timelines make it easier to persuade others than simply claiming, “I won’t have capacity then.” Gantt charts also help identify lighter periods for progressing lower-priority tasks or scheduling breaks. They reveal task dependencies to encourage timely completions and highlight independent activities that can be tackled during quieter spells. Moreover, they foster realistic expectations about task durations and clarify mutual support timelines within teams. Not sure how to make a start? Learn more here in the Research Whisperers blog that gives a simple guide to creating a Gantt Chart. What will you take forward? One thing to consider: What would become easier to explain or negotiate if you could show your workload visually rather than holding it in your head?
Peer Discussion Guide: Protecting your time (saying yes, no, and not now)
This guide is designed for peer-facilitated discussion to help you get more from the established researcher resources. It curates a small selection of related resources and offers a light structure for reflection and conversation. They are not training sessions. They are structured opportunities to pause, think, and learn with others. There is no expert facilitator in the room. Everyone participates as an equal, taking shared responsibility for holding the structure, time, and quality of the conversation. Our Peer Discussion Guides Find out more about our Peer Discussion Guides and how you can use them to help you get more from our established researcher resources.
Peer Discussion Guide: Being more strategic with your time and workload
This guide is designed for peer-facilitated discussion to help you get more from the established researcher resources. It curates a small selection of related resources and offers a light structure for reflection and conversation. They are not training sessions. They are structured opportunities to pause, think, and learn with others. There is no expert facilitator in the room. Everyone participates as an equal, taking shared responsibility for holding the structure, time, and quality of the conversation. Our Peer Discussion Guides Find out more about our Peer Discussion Guides and how you can use them to help you get more from our established researcher resources.
Committing to committees: review the value you get from participation in committees
Participation in committees can feel meaningful and worthwhile. The committee work can align well with the work you’re doing at the moment, as well as where you might be able to make changes or develop your role in the future. Consider the committees and working groups that you are part of. What do each of these give to you (think about skills, experience, networks, opportunity to work on something that’s important to you, visibility, joy…). Consider the balance – are they also taking from you in terms of time and energy. This Inside Higher Ed article shares some further reflections on strategic committee choice and explains that whilst committee service can be strategic career capital, not all committee work is equal: Moving your career forward through service on committees (opinion) Reflect on your own committee participation: Take a few minutes of reflection time to ask yourself: This review can help you to make decisions about which committees are still serving you and which might be ones you need to move on from or renegotiate your involvement. It may also highlight some areas of confusion or unclear expectations: is there someone (perhaps a previous committee member or a member of professional …
Finding and working with a mentor
Never is working with a good mentor more important than when you are an established researcher, jugging multiple demands and needing a trusted and knowledgeable sounding board. Don’t wait for an official mentoring scheme to find a mentor. Choosing, recruiting, and working with a mentor is a resource developed by Dr Kay Guccione. It explains how choosing and working with a mentor can give you structured time to think through your career, navigate your Institution, and make better‑informed decisions at any stage of your academic journey. It offers practical guidance on identifying the right mentor for you, setting expectations, and getting the most out of conversations so that they genuinely support your professional and career development. What will you take forward? One thing to try: What’s the one challenge where a mentor’s guidance would help you most right now? And who, someone you genuinely trust and find credible, will you reach out to for an informal discussion?
Explore tailored research leadership resources
Established researchers express a wide range of leadership and management needs such as recruitment, performance conversations, delegation, effective meetings, coaching and mentoring skills etc. There is an overwhelming amount of advice out there: some relevant to established researchers, some less so. Rather than re-create it all here, we recommend and connect you directly to open access resources that are tailored to research and academic leaders: What will you take forward? One thing to consider: What is one leadership challenge you’re dealing with at the moment? Which single external resource could you engage with this week to move forward?