The Drexler–Sibbet Team Performance Model offers a practical roadmap for building and sustaining effective project teams. It maps seven predictable stages that teams move through – from initial orientation to high performance and renewal – each centred on a core question that the team must answer well before it can progress. For established researchers, who assemble new teams from scratch for specific grants or projects, often across institutional boundaries and with people who have not worked together before, the model is particularly valuable because it makes visible the work that typically goes undone: establishing shared purpose, building trust, and agreeing how decisions will be made, before the real delivery pressure begins. The seven stages and their central questions are: The model is also useful as a diagnostic when a project team is struggling: it helps identify whether the underlying problem is unresolved purpose, lack of trust, unclear roles, or something else entirely – each of which requires a different response. What will you take forward? One thing to consider: Think about a project team that underperformed or felt difficult to lead. Looking at the seven stages, at which point did the foundations start to feel shaky, and what would you …
Committing to committees: review the value you get from participation in committees
Participation in committees can feel meaningful and worthwhile. The committee work can align well with the work you’re doing at the moment, as well as where you might be able to make changes or develop your role in the future. Consider the committees and working groups that you are part of. What do each of these give to you (think about skills, experience, networks, opportunity to work on something that’s important to you, visibility, joy…). Consider the balance – are they also taking from you in terms of time and energy. This Inside Higher Ed article shares some further reflections on strategic committee choice and explains that whilst committee service can be strategic career capital, not all committee work is equal: Moving your career forward through service on committees (opinion) Reflect on your own committee participation: Take a few minutes of reflection time to ask yourself: This review can help you to make decisions about which committees are still serving you and which might be ones you need to move on from or renegotiate your involvement. It may also highlight some areas of confusion or unclear expectations: is there someone (perhaps a previous committee member or a member of professional …
Create a group charter or lab book
A research group charter or team / lab manual helps set clear expectations, shared values, and standard practices so that your group can collaborate efficiently and avoid confusion. They can be a valuable resource for getting new recruits up to speed quickly, saving you time during induction. Some research leaders send the manual to prospective students or postdocs so that they can see what to expect from the team. There are many examples of these available for you to adapt to your own circumstances. However, one of the most important things is that these are living documents, and the team feel a sense of ownership over them. The conversations around what should go in them are as valuable as the documents themselves. The following resources help you think about how you might approach writing a manual, charter or handbook for your group. If one of the aims of your team charter is to ensure your team is inclusive, you may find these resources provide some helpful considerations: Finally, this handbook-type resource was created by the Turing Institute to reflect some of the collaborative and interdisciplinary challenges in data science, with practical tools and solutions to address these. It includes advice …
Explore tailored research leadership resources
Established researchers express a wide range of leadership and management needs such as recruitment, performance conversations, delegation, effective meetings, coaching and mentoring skills etc. There is an overwhelming amount of advice out there: some relevant to established researchers, some less so. Rather than re-create it all here, we recommend and connect you directly to open access resources that are tailored to research and academic leaders: What will you take forward? One thing to consider: What is one leadership challenge you’re dealing with at the moment? Which single external resource could you engage with this week to move forward?